Its At a new Address.......
www.laststrawsangha.org/

Noam Chomsky (Who besides having been voted worlds top intellectual thinker in a European poll, also identifies himself as an Anarchist), uses the term "Libertarian Socialist". I think using that word helps escape the wrong perception that is created by the term Anarchy, and does describe the position pretty well.

Anarchists are not necessarily against rules. They are against hierarchy. The issue of enforcing rules can vary depending on whether you are talking about individualist or collectivist branches of the philosophy. Proudhon felt that collective self defense against rapists and murderers was justified. What he was advocating was not "every man woman and child for themselves".

Anarchists oppose state socialist dictatorships. They are against the centralization of power.

Anarchists oppose democratic centralism. However, they have practiced forms of democracy, even representative democracy, but its a "bottom up" democracy where unions and district collectives form unions and elect non permanent union representatives (In the case of syndicalism), whose decisions can be overturned by super majority vote and who can be recalled at any time. Delegates have no power to contract popular will.

Anarchists support the right "not to associate". When you join collective society, you give up some degree of personal autonomy in exchange for fellowship. People should be able to do anything they wish to themselves in their own space and its nobody elses business. Society is not justified in controlling your actions, but they are justified in self defense even collective self defense if you prey on the weak.

Anarchists believe that rent is robbery, and are opponents of every form of "usury" and interest based economy. Anarchists advocate land stewardship instead of private property or state property.

Many Anarchists were Atheists, but there have been examples of religious Anarchist groups, such as Leo Tolstoy who sometimes called himself a Christian Anarchist....I see no reason why eastern philosophy would not also be compatible.

These are some but not all of the historic Anarchist perspectives. Obviously its not what most people think of when they hear the word, so maybe Libertarian Socialism is a better choice.